Big Al’s Place

December, 2007

Extremism

DISCLAIMER: Pastor Scott DID NOT ask me to write this — I got the idea for it before I read his blog entry, and I wrote most of it before hearing his sermon on 12/16.

arguingcouple.jpg

I just read a fascinating article about what happens when relatively like-minded people get together (go here if you’d like to read it). Someone took a bunch of people who didn’t know one another and grouped them together according to whether they identified themselves as conservative or liberal. Before they were put into their groups, the participants each completed a short anomymous survey identifying their positions on a number of issues, like taxes, civil unions, climate change, and the like. The folks were then placed in their groups and encouraged to discuss the issues. After fifteen minutes, everyone repeated the anonymous survey. The result of the fifteen minutes of hanging out with like-minded folks was that nearly everyone became more extreme in their views. Those who opposed civil unions opposed them all the more, those who support action to reduce climate change became more strident in their support, and the like.

The point of the article was to indicate that in the early 21st century, it’s very easy to find your own niche group and to find folks who will draw you to the extremes. It’s almost impossible to find support for the middle position. This got me thinking about how this phenomenon ought to work in Lamb of God. I’m not really talking about political or social views, extreme and otherwise, although it seems to me that the input of our brothers and sisters ought to have a significant impact on how we form our own opinions.

But there’s one thing about which we should be extremists, and that’s the area in which we should be encouraging extremism in one another: we should be extremely, insanely, incredibly in love with Jesus and His people, and we should be extremists about furthering the Kingdom of God, whether we do so though evangelism, or prayer, or good works, or whatever the Lord has given us to do.

And now, a break from your regularly scheduled rant…

I’d like to say that I found this site while researching some profound theological or scientific truths, but I can’t — a friend sent it to me. In keeping with the season, it’s THE CAVALCADE OF BAD NATIVITIES!!

http://www.goingjesus.com/cavalcade1.shtml

And check out this YouTube video of Straight No Chaser singing(?) The Twelve Days of Christmas:

Pascal’s Wager: An Environmental Version

What is Pascal’s Wager? It’s an argument for belief in God based on the possible benefits of such belief rather than trying to prove whether or not God exists. Here is Pascal’s simplest statement of the argument:

“God is, or He is not.” But to which side shall we incline? Reason can decide nothing here. There is an infinite chaos which separated us. A game is being played at the extremity of this infinite distance where heads or tails will turn up… Which will you choose then? Let us see. Since you must choose, let us see which interests you least. You have two things to lose, the true and the good; and two things to stake, your reason and your will, your knowledge and your happiness; and your nature has two things to shun, error and misery. Your reason is no more shocked in choosing one rather than the other, since you must of necessity choose… But your happiness? Let us weigh the gain and the loss in wagering that God is… If you gain, you gain all; if you lose, you lose nothing. Wager, then, without hesitation that He is.

So to give a quick summary: 1. You bet that God exists. If you’re wrong, you’ve lost nothing. If you’re right, you’ve gained eternal joy. 2. You bet that God doesn’t exist. If you’re wrong, you’ve gained eternal misery. If you’re right, you’ve neither gained nor lost. So the better choice is to bet that God exists. (more…)